Voting 2014 VPS List Getting Our Graduates into Classrooms Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Visual and Aesthetic Aspects in Distance Education Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Quality Matters for Internal Review Process Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Effective Academic and Services Planning Operations for Student Success Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Trash Pedagogy: Andragogy Leads to Student Engagement and Success in Online Courses Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Growing Quality Matters in an Online Organization: A Grass-roots Approach Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Exposición filatélica digital documentada Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Using VoiceThread in Queensborough Community College Hybrid Online Early American Literature Class” Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Logical, ethical, organizational, and professional leadership reasoning skills, as well as analytical. Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Best of Both Worlds: Combining the Virtual and the Personal for Hybrid Expository Writing Courses Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Integrando Valores en la Educación a Distancia Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ XMsMlUJPvkUqfycujbq Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ VmMHylRKEgV Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ Name of the Evaluation Board Member 1. Level of innovation * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2. Meaningful use of technology – demonstrates not only how technologies were put in place but also how effectively those technologies were to achieving the goals in online environments * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. Demonstrated benefit to overall student success and institutional effectiveness in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4. Contribution to decision-making and improvement processes in Distance Learning * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. Usefulness and cost-effectiveness * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6. Use of specific examples, evidence, or indicators to demonstrate success * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7. Quality of the proposal * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. Hispanic focus * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9. Lessons learned * 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ
