Impact of a Simulated Game on Learning and Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v6.n2.229Palabras clave:
NetGeneration, digital natives, educational gamesResumen
Today’s students are digital natives who have grown up with computer technology and video games. Their constant exposure to the internet and other digital media has shaped the way they receive, process and learn information. Consequently, the traditional lecture and textbook approach to education is not as effective for this generation. We believe that students can benefit from reality based computer simulated games which are incorporated into the course curriculum. Games and computer simulations are no longer just for fun; they can be used as an effective pedagogical tool to enhance learning and foster an engaged learning environment. While there is a general consensus among educators that educational games are an effective method of motivating students, there is a lack of empirical studies relating to the impact of this teaching modality on students’ academic performance and engagement. This paper reports on the effectiveness of using a computer simulated game on student learning and engagement in three different business courses.
Métricas
Citas
Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85.
Canon-Bowers, J. (2006). The state of gaming and simulation. Paper presented at In Training 2006 Conference and Expo, Orlando,FL.
Coller, B., Shernoff, D. (2009). Video-based education in mechanical engineering: A look at student engagement. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(2), 308- 317.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715-730.
Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill Jr, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20(2), 159-165.
Gee, J. P. (2005). The new literacy studies: From 'socially situated' to the work of the social. Situated Literacies:Reading and Writing in Context, (2), 177-194.
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414- 434.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Malone, T. W. (1981). What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Pipeline, 6(2), 50.
Mayo, M. J. (2007). Games for science and engineering education. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 30-35.
Oblinger, D. G. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004(1), 10.
Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12.
Piaget, J. (1962). Commentary on Vygotsky's criticisms of language and thought of the child and judgment and reasoning in the child. Critical Assessments, (1), 241-260.
Prensky, M. (2007). How to teach with technology: Keeping both teachers and students comfortable in a era of exponential change. Emerging Technologies for Learning, 2(4), 40-46.
Rickard, W., & Oblinger, D. (2004). Unlocking the potential of gaming technology. Paper presented at The Higher Education Leaders Symposium, Richmond, Washington.
Rodley, C. (2005, October 27). Meeting the demands of the NetGen. Retrieved August 3, 2015, from http://sydney.edu.au/news/84.html?newsstoryid=744.
Rogosa, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 726-748.
Rowe, J. P., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2011). Integrating learning, problem solving and engagement in narrative centered learning environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21, 115-133.
Sabourin, J., & Lester, J. (2014). Affect and engagement in game-based learning environments. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 5(1), 45-56.
Shaffer, D. W., Halverson, R., Squire, K. R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning (2005-4). Wisconsin Center for Education Research (NJ1).
Squire, K. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Journal of Online Education, 1(6).
Taradi, S., Taradi, M., Radic, K., & Pocrajac, N. (2005). Blending problem-based learning with web technology positively impacts students learning outcomes in acid-based physiology. Journal of Advanced Physiology Education, 29, 35-39.
Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., & Van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249-265.
Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1982). Gain scores in research can be highly reliable. Journal Educational Measurement, 19(2), 149-154.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Open Access Policy Statement
HETS Online Journal has adopted an open access policy and provides immediate access to its content free of charge to the reader. The journal does not pass on the cost of publication or submission of manuscripts, known as an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors.
HOJ is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA.
