Enhancing Linear Algebra Learning through Computational Thinking: A Project-Based Approach

Autores/as

  • Tanvir Prince Hostos Community College, City University of New York (CUNY)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v13.n2.129

Palabras clave:

pensamiento computacional, educación, matemáticas, algoritmo, codificación, abstracción, descomposición, depuración, reconocimiento de patrones

Resumen

Este artiículo analiza la integración de conceptos de pensamiento computacional, incluidos algoritmos, codificación, abstracción, descomposición, depuración y reconocimiento de patrones, en un curso de a?lgebra lineal en un colegio comunitario en el oton?o de 2022. A trave?s de la implementacio?n del aprendizaje basado en proyectos (PBL ), nuestro objetivo fue mejorar la comprensio?n de los estudiantes de los temas de a?lgebra lineal mientras los familiariza?bamos con los conceptos esenciales del pensamiento computacional. Una pre y una posprueba evaluaron la familiaridad de los estudiantes con los conceptos. Los resultados indicaron una mejora significativa en la comprensio?n de los conceptos de los estudiantes de pensamiento computacional y su aplicacio?n en a?lgebra lineal.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Tanvir Prince, Hostos Community College, City University of New York (CUNY)

Associate Professor
Department of Mathematics

 

Citas

Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. N. (2016). Computational thinking education: problems and perspectives. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 1-9.

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.

Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. M., & Minniti, L. (2015). Coding as a Trojan horse for mathematics education reform. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(2), 155-173.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.

Kalelio?lu, F., Gülbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A framework for computational thinking based on a systematic research review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583-596.

Kazimoglu, C., Kiernan, M., Bacon, L., & MacKinnon, L. (2012). Learning programming at the computational thinking level via digital game-play. Procedia Computer Science, 9, 522-531.

Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., ... & Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 32-37.

Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61.

Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95-123.

Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017). Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher's perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 469-495.

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127-147.

Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2015). To block or not to block, that is the question: students' perceptions of blocks-based programming. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC '15, 199-208.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 59(8), 55-62.

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1-16.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-05-15

Cómo citar

Prince, T. (2023). Enhancing Linear Algebra Learning through Computational Thinking: A Project-Based Approach. HETS Online Journal, 13(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v13.n2.129

Número

Sección

Articles