Comparison of Student's retention of core concepts in Traditional, Hybrid and Writing-Intensive Allied Health Microbiology and Infection Control Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v6.n1.220Keywords:
student retentionAbstract
The purpose of this study was to probe best course modality for the student population of a community college taking the Microbiology and Infection Control Courses. Students’ retention of knowledge base was compared in Traditional, Hybrid and Writing-Intensive Microbiology and Infectious Disease Control courses. Students' final grades achieved in the course and withdrawal rates were used to evaluate the comprehension of knowledge and students' overall performance. Additionally, students’ scores for a specific set of twenty five questions in the final lecture exam were utilized as part of the embedded assessment for retention of knowledge base, and general education proficiencies were also compared. All courses used in this study were taught by the same instructor, the difference being the lecture delivery mode. Students in all courses were provided with the same lecture notes via Blackboard. For the Traditional and Writing-Intensive (WI) courses, there were weekly in-class lectures with duration of three hours each; however, there were no in-class lectures for Hybrid courses and face to face component was three hour/week Lab session. WI students were required to do formal and informal writing assignments based on the core topics, though Lab components were exactly same for students in all courses modalities in this study. Data analysis revealed that students in Traditional courses performed much better in most aspects measured in this study, as compared to students in Hybrid and Writing-Intensive courses. Withdrawal rates were same in Hybrid and WI courses, but higher than Traditional courses. The number of students who received an overall F grade was highest in the WI courses. In terms of correct responses to embedded assessment questions, the difference was significantly higher for students in WI courses as compared to Traditional.
Metrics
References
Ahlawat, S., Miller, G., & Shahid, A. (2011). Developing a writing-intensive accounting capstone course with a research emphasis. The Accounting Educators' Journal, 21(1), 45-58.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
Alison E. M. Adams, Shelby R., and Tinna T. (2015). A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology. CBE Life Sciences Education. (14)1-8.
Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the Secondary School: English and the Content Areas. Research Monograph No.21 Urbana: NCTE, 1981
Black, G. (Spring, 2002). A Comparison of Traditional, Online, and Hybrid Methods of Course Delivery. Journal of Business Administration Online, 1(1), np. Retrieved January 10, 2015, from https://www.atu.edu/jbao/spring2002/black.pdf
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. eds. 2006. The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Cannon, R. (1990). Writing to Learn.In Bazerman, C.(Ed.), Reference Guide to Writing Across the Curriculum (p. 65). Parlor Press LLC, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906
Colis, B., & Moonen. J. (2001). Flexible Learning in a Digital world: Experiences and Expectations. London: Kogan Page.
Collopy,R.M.B., & Arnold, J.M. (2009). To blend or not to blend: Online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 85-101.
DeNeui, D.L., & Dodge, T.L. (2006). Asynchronous learning networks and student outcomes: The utility of online learning components in hybrid courses. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 256-259
Ernst, J. V., (2008). A Comparison of Traditional and Hybrid Online Instructional Presentation in Communication Technology. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 40-49. Retrieved January 6, 2015, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v19n2/pdf/ernst.pdf
Faaborg, J. E., Ryan, M. R.,& Millspaugh, J. J. (2004). Academic performance in Writing- Intensive courses: Can we better prepare transfer students? Natural Resources and Environmental Issues 12, p-p
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guideline. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Son. DOI: 10.1002/9781118269558
Goldrick-Rab, S. (2010). Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Community College Student Success. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 437-469. doi:10.3102/0034654310370163
Graham, T.A. (2001). Teaching child development via the Internet: Opportunities and pitfalls. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 67-71.
Guha, S. (2001). An effective way of teaching early childhood education online. Childhood Education, 77(4), 226-229.
Hillstock, L.G. (2005, August). A few common misconceptions about distance learning. Published proceedings of the ASCUE Conference, Myrtle Beach, SC.
Hoffman, D.W. (2002). Internet-based distance learning in higher education. Tech Directions, 62(1).
Humphries, J. 2009. Gauging Faculty Attitudes Toward Online and Hybrid Learning. Journal of Applied Computing. 5 (1): 28–32.
Kaczynski, D. and Kelly, M. (2004). Curriculum development for teaching qualitative data analysis online. Published proceedings of the International Conference on Qualitative Research in IT & IT, Brisbane, Australia. Krawiec, S., Salter, D., & Kay, E. J. (2005). A Hybrid Bacteriology Course; The
Professor's Design and Expectations; The Students' Performance and Assessment. Microbiology. Education.6, 8 -13. Retrieved February 21, 2015, fromhttp://jmbe.asm.org/asm/index.php/jmbe/article/view/78/html_20 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3633137/
Lamport, M. A., & Hill, R. J. (2012). Impact of Hybrid Instruction on Student Achievement in Post-Secondary Institutions: A Synthetic Review of the Literature. Journal of Instructional Research, 1, 49-58. Retrieved February 15, 2015 from https://cirt.gcu.edu/jir/documents/2012-v1/lamport-hillpdf#content-head
LaRocque, G. (1983). Writing in the Secondary School: English and the Content Areas by Arthur N. Applebee; Anne Auten; Fran Lehr. College Composition and Communication, 34(2), 223-225. Retrieved March 20, 2015, from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/357415?uid=3739832&uid=2134&uid=2492 543713&uid=2492543703&uid=2&uid=70&uid=3&uid=3739256&uid=60&sid=21 106416942433
MacDonald, S.P. and Cooper, C. (1992). Writing to Learn. In Bazerman, C. (Ed.), Reference Guide to Writing Across the Curriculum (p. 65). Parlor Press LLC, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906
Mayers, P., Gialamas, S., & Cherif, A. (2006). DeVry University's Optimize Integrated Learning System (Optimizing the Power of Onsite and Online Teaching and Learning). Paper presentation. Academic Affairs Department, DeVry University, Oakbrook Terrace, IL. Retrieved February 18, 2015 from http://www.abourcherif.com/pdfs/iOptimizeIntegrating%20Learning%20System.pd f
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Report No. ED- 04- CO-0040. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence- based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Melton, B., Graf, H., & Chopak-Foss, J. (2009). Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-13.
Meyer, K. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. ASHE ERIC Higher Education Report, 29(4).
Mitchell, J. L. (2012). Beyound Academics: Challenging Issues Facing Community College Nonacademic Support Services (Doctoral Dissertation, 58). Retrieved December 15, 2014 from http://digitalcommons.nl.edu/diss/58/
National Center for Education Statistics. (NCES, 2014). Table 326.30. Retention of first- time degree-seeking undergraduates at degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by attendance status, level and control of institution, and percentage of applications accepted: 2006 to 2012. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_326.30.asp
Rath, B., Rock, K., & Laferriere, A. (2013, April 1). Pathways through College: Strategies for Improving Community College Student Success. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from http://www.opp.org/docs/PathwaysCollegeStrategies_StudentSuccess.pdf
Riffell, S., & Merrill. J. (2005). Do Hybrid Lecture Formats Influence Laboratory Performance in Large, Pre-Professional Biology Courses? Journal of Natural Resources and Life Science Education 34, 96–100
Rovai, A.P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 5 (2). Retrieved January 26, 2015, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/192/274
Slevin, J., et al. (1990) “Georgetown University.” Programs That Works Models and Methods for Writing Across the Curriculum. Ed. Toby Fulwiler and Art Young: Portsmouth, NH: Boyton.
Smagorinsky, P., (1995). Constructing Meaning in the Disciplines: Reconceptualizing Writing across the Curriculum as Composing across the Curriculum. American Journal of Education 103( 2 ) 160-184 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1085575
Taradi, S.K., Taradi, M., Radic, K., & Pokrajac, N. (2005). Blending problem-based learning with web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid- base physiology. Advances in Physiological Education, 29(1), 35-39. doi:10.1152/advan.00026.2004
Waller, L. R., & Tietjen-Smith, T. (2009). A National Study of Community College Retention Rates Segmented by Institutional Degree of Urbanization. Academic Leadership, 7(1), 1-3. Retrieved December 17, 2014, from http://knowledgecenter.completionbydesign.org/sites/default/files/294 Waller 2009.pdf
Wild, L., & Ebbers, D. (2002). Rethinking students’ retention in community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26, 503-519.
Wingard, R. G., (November, 2004). Classroom Teaching Changes in Web-Enhanced Courses. EDUCAUSE QUARTERLY, 26-35. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0414.pdf
Yang, Y. and Cornelius, L.F. (2004). Students’ perceptions towards the quality of online education: A qualitative approach. Published proceedings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Conference, Chicago, IL.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy Statement
HETS Online Journal has adopted an open access policy and provides immediate access to its content free of charge to the reader. The journal does not pass on the cost of publication or submission of manuscripts, known as an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors.
HOJ is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA.
