Comparison of academic performance with a traditional textbook versus a digital openly-licensed textbook
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v13.n1.63Keywords:
digital textbook, openly-licensed resources, traditional textbook, Hispanic-Serving Institution, academic performanceAbstract
With the utilization of open educational resources (OER) and digital materials becoming more popular, research is needed to determine if academic outcomes are affected with the increasing shift to digital content. The goal of this research was to analyze the academic performance of students using a traditional physical textbook, as compared to those using an electronic copy of a similar textbook provided free through the campus library. The traditional and digital no-cost textbook comparisons were made between two sections of the same upper division undergraduate course taught at Hispanic-Serving Institution. The two sections of the course were taught during the Fall 2019 semester, both online, with the same faculty member facilitating both sections. There was no statistical difference in mean discussion grades, t(62)=-0.714, p=0.478, d=0.178444, mean written assignment grades, t(62)=-1.985, p=0.053, d=0.49613, and mean quiz grades, t(62)=-1.711, p=0.092, d=0.427858. However, when looking at the overall total course grade, the mean no-cost course was statistically higher than the traditional textbook course, t(62)=-2.097, p=0.042, d=0.524348. Instructors do not need to be concerned about student outcomes with the increasing implementation of such materials. Universities providing free digital access to textbooks can help address financial concerns for these students without sacrificing academic performance.
Metrics
References
Allen, G., Guzman-Alvarez, A., Molinaro, M., & Larsen, D. (2015). Assessing the impact and
efficacy of the open-access ChemWiki textbook project [PDF document]. Educause
Learning Initiative Brief. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/elib1501.pdf.
Ariyo, O., & Reams-Johnson, A. (2021). Destroying the Textbook Tower: Analysis of OER. In
Enhancing Higher Education Accessibility Through Open Education and Prior Learning
(pp. 53-66). IGI Global.
Baker, R. S., Lindrum, D., Lindrum, M. J., & Perkowski, D. (2015). Analyzing early at-risk
factors in higher education elearning courses. Proceedings of the 8th International
Conference on Educational Data Mining. Retrieved from
http://www.columbia.edu/~rsb2162/2015paper41.pdf
Boling, B. W., & Kohn, K. (2019). Textbooks are expensive, but OER can be challenging:
Providing e-textbook access through the library. Proceedings of the Charleston Library
Conference. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317037
Chulkov, D. V., & Vanalstine, J. (2013). College student choice among electronic and printed
textbook options. Journal of Education for Business, 88(4), 216–222.
doi:10.1080/08832323.2012.672936
Choppin, J., Carson, C., Borys, Z., Cerosaletti, C., & Gillis, R. (2014). A typology for analyzing
digital curricula in mathematics education [PDF document]. International Journal of
Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(1), 11-25. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066359.pdf
Clinton, V., & Khan, S. (2019). Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and
course withdrawal rates: a meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–20.
doi:10.1177/2332858419872212
Covarrubias, R., & Fryberg, S. A. (2015). Movin’ on up (to college): First-generation college
students’ experiences with family achievement guilt. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic
Minority Psychology, 21, 420-429. doi:10.1037/a0037844
Covarrubias, R., Valle, I., Laiduc, G., & Azmita, M. (2019). “You never become fully
independent”: Family roles and independence in first-generation college students.
Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(4): 381–410.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558418788402
Denis, J., Donadio, A., & Klein, K. (2015). The Environmental Impact of Growing Numbers of
E-books in Libraries [PDF document]. Retrieved from
https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/cas_sites/envstudies/pdf/Student
Research/2015 project paper/paper-2.pdf.
deNoyelles, A., & Raible, J. (2017). Exploring the Use of E-Textbooks in Higher Education: A
Multiyear Study. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/10/exploring-the-
use-of-e-textbooks-in-higher-eduation-a-multiyear-study.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger
Vehicle [PDF document]. (EPA-420-F-14-040). Washington, DC: Office of
Transportation and Air Quality.
Ermis-Demirtas, H., Watson, J. C., Karaman, M. A., Freeman, P., Kumaran, A., Haktanir, A., &
Streeter, A. M. (2018). Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of
perceived social support within Hispanic college students. Hispanic Journal of
Behavioral Sciences, 40(4), 472-485.
Feldstein, A., Martin, M., Hudson, A., Warren, K., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2012). Open
textbooks and increased student access and outcomes. European Journal of Open,
Distance and E-Learning, 16(57). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ992490
Fischer, L., Hilton, J., Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the
impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students.
Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159–172. doi:10.1007/s12528-015-
-x
Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research
on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4),
–590. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
Hilton, J., Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The adoption of open
educational resources by one community college math department. The International
Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4), 37–50.
doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1523
Jenkins, J. J., Sánchez, L. A., Schraedley, M. A., Hannans, J., Navick, N., & Young, J. (2020).
Textbook broke: Textbook affordability as a social justice issue. Journal of Interactive
Media in Education, 1(3), 1.
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus
computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of
Educational Research, 58, 61-68. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
Millar, M., & Schrier, T. (2015). Digital or printed textbooks: which do students prefer and why?
Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15(2), 166–185.
doi:10.1080/15313220.2015.1026474
Montalto, C. P., Phillips, E. L., McDaniel, A., & Baker, A. R. (2019). College student financial
wellness: Student loans and beyond. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 40(1), 3-21.
Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., & Jamali, H. R. (2010). E-textbook use, information seeking
behaviour and its impact: Case study business and management. Journal of Information
Science, 36(2), 263–280.
doi: 10.1177/0165551510363660
Pawlyshyn, N., Braddlee, Casper, L., & Miller, H. (2013). Adopting OER: A Case Study of
Cross-Institutional Collaboration and Innovation. Retrieved from
https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/11/adopting-oer-a-case-study-of-crossinstitutio
nal-collaboration-and-innovation.
Rodríguez Amaya, L., Betancourt, T., Collins, K. H., Hinojosa, O., & Corona, C. (2018).
Undergraduate research experiences: Mentoring, awareness, and perceptions—A case
study at a Hispanic-serving institution. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-
Weisberg, M. (2011). Student attitudes and behaviors towards digital textbooks. Publishing
Research Quarterly, 27(2), 188-196. doi:10.1007/s12109-011-9217-4
Winitzky-Stephens, J., & Pickavance, J. (2017). Open education resources and student learning
outcomes: a multilevel analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance
Learning, 18(4), p. 35-49.
Xu, G. F., & Guo, J. X. (2018). Improving library user experience: Wi-Fi network assessment.
Journal of Library Administration, 58(8), 806–834.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas A. Clobes, J. Jacob Jenkins, Hannah Haid, Rebecca Allen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy Statement
HETS Online Journal has adopted an open access policy and provides immediate access to its content free of charge to the reader. The journal does not pass on the cost of publication or submission of manuscripts, known as an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors.
HOJ is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA.