The Adverse Digital Childhood Experiences (ADCEs) Framework: A Transformative Paradigm for Decoding Digital Adversity and Safeguarding Human Agency in Child Development and Lifespan Trajectories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v16.n1.355Keywords:
adverse digital childhood experiences, cyberbullying, digital addiction, technoference, online sexual exploitation, AI-mediated influence, human agency, child neurodevelopment, developmental screening rubric, digital policyAbstract
Childhood is no longer confined to physical spaces; It increasingly unfolds within digitally saturated environments where algorithmically mediated technologies shape attention, learning, and identity formation from the earliest years. Traditional adversity frameworks, particularly the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) model, do not capture the distinctive, persistent, and often invisible risks of digital life. To address this gap, this study advances the Adverse Digital Childhood Experiences (ADCEs) framework, an empirically informed and theory-driven extension of ACEs that systematizes ten interrelated domains of digital adversity encompassing social, cognitive, and environmental stressors. These include cyberbullying and exploitation, commercial surveillance and privacy harms, technoference and digital neglect, identity distortion, exposure to harmful content, ideological manipulation, and displacement of physical play and nature engagement. Developed through an integrative synthesis of multidisciplinary evidence, the ADCEs framework delineates mechanisms through which digital and AI-mediated systems may influence neurocognitive, socioemotional, and ethical development. A structured research and clinical rubric is proposed to support psychometric validation, longitudinal tracking, and cross-cultural adaptation. By integrating developmental science, digital ethics, and public health, the ADCEs framework provides a coherent scaffold for research, screening, and intervention, enabling policymakers, educators, and clinicians to safeguard children’s well-being and agency across convergent physical–digital ecologies.
Metrics
References
Akram, M., & Nasar, A. (2023). Systematic review of radicalization through social media. Ege Academic Review, 23(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1166627
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Avci, H., Baams, L., & Kretschmer, T. (2025). A systematic review of social media use and adolescent identity development. Adolescent Research Review, 10, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-024-00251-1
Aziz, N., Nordin, M. J., Abdulkadir, S. J., & Salih, M. M. M. (2021). Digital addiction: Systematic review of computer game addiction impact on adolescent physical health. Electronics, 10(9), 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10090996
Berthon, P., Pitt, L., & Campbell, C. (2019). Addictive De-Vices: A public policy analysis of sources and solutions to digital addiction. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915619859852
Cambridge Judge Business School. (2024, January 5). What’s coming in 2024? Cambridge Judge Business School. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/2024/whats-coming-in-2024/
DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications (5?? ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ding, K., Shen, Y., Liu, Q., & Li, H. (2023). The effects of digital addiction on brain function and structure of children and adolescents: A scoping review. Healthcare, 12(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010015
Erstad, O., & Voogt, J. (2018). The twenty-first century curriculum: Issues and challenges. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 19–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_2
Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. R. (2016). Social media and body image concerns: Current research and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005
Federal Trade Commission. (2023). Protecting children’s privacy online: A report to Congress. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2024.03.21-PrivacyandDataSecurityUpdate-508.pdf
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., Koss, M. P., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8
Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the nation’s youth. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. https://www.unh.edu/ccrc/sites/default/files/media/2022-03/online-victimization-a-report-on-the-nations-youth.pdf
Gill, P., Corner, E., Conway, M., Thornton, A., Bloom, M., & Horgan, J. (2017). Terrorist use of the internet by the numbers: Quantifying behaviors, patterns and processes. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12249
The Guardian view on digital media: The case for better regulation must be made. (2024, December 26). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/dec/26/the-guardian-view-on-digital-media-the-case-for-better-regulation-must-be-made
Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Routledge.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2024). Cyberbullying: Prevention and intervention strategies. Cyberbullying Research Center. https://cyberbullying.org/Cyberbullying-Identification-Preventiosponse-2024.pdf
Kuo, F. E. (2015). How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01093
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past, looking to the future. New Media & Society, 22(3), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819897747
Livingstone, S., & Smith, P. K. (2014). Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: The nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(6), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12197
Mallawaarachchi, S., Burley, J., Mavilidi, M., Howard, S. J., Straker, L., Kervin, L., Staton, S., Hayes, N., Machell, A., Torjinski, M., Brady, B., Thomas, G., Horwood, S., White, S. L. J., Zabatiero, J., Rivera, C., & Cliff, D. (2024). Early childhood screen use contexts and cognitive and psychosocial outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.2620
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. . (2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 88(4), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822
McDaniel, B. T., Uva, S., Pater, J., Cornet, V., Drouin, M., & Radesky, J. (2024). Daily smartphone use predicts parent depressive symptoms, but parents' perceptions of responsiveness to their child moderate this effect. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 2, 1421717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdpys.2024.1421717
Nivins, S., Sauce, B., Liebherr, M., Judd, N., & Klingberg, T. (2024). Long-term impact of digital media on brain development in children. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 13030. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63566-y
OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2023_c74f03de-en/full-report.html
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Shiferaw, B. D., Tang, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Mackay, L. E., Luo, Y., Yan, N., Shen, X., Zhou, T., Zhu, Y., Cai, J., Wang, Q., Yan, W., Gao, X., Pan, H., & Wang, W. (2025). Impact of digital addiction on youth health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 14(3), 1129–1158. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00081
Soriano-Molina, E., Limiñana-Gras, R. M., Patró-Hernández, R. M., & Rubio-Aparicio, M. (2025). The association between internet addiction and adolescents’ mental health: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020116
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
WeProtect Global Alliance. (2023). Annual Review 2023: WeProtect Global Alliance. https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/WeProtect-2023-EOY-Report-final.pdf
Whittle, H., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Beech, A., & Collings, G. (2013). A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.003
World Health Organization. (2022). What works to prevent online violence against children Geneva: World Health Organization, Violence Prevention Unit https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240062061?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Zhu, C., Huang, S., Evans, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 6349
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asrat Amnie

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy Statement
HETS Online Journal has adopted an open access policy and provides immediate access to its content free of charge to the reader. The journal does not pass on the cost of publication or submission of manuscripts, known as an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors.
HOJ is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA.