Unified Communications Technology: The Considerations for Adoption for Administration and Pedagogy

Authors

  • Patricia Kahn College of Staten Island

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v5.n1.206

Keywords:

unified learning environment, unified communications technology

Abstract

We are in a different place, where today’s learners require educators to broaden their methods of pedagogy in order to interact more effectively with digital-native learners (Dietz, 2010). Educators need a less structured and more informal learning setting that leverages already established teaching tools supporting a constructivist learning environment (Dietz, 2010). In addition, institutions need to leverage these technologies with their business processes in order to provide for greater efficiencies and collaboration (Herrell, 2011).  In support of these findings, The College of Staten Island (CSI) has researched unified communications (UC) technology that uses a unified learning environment. This comprehensive solution will be used to replace a life-cycled phone system, as well as enhance administrative processes and pedagogical applications. This paper will discuss the technology status at CSI, options in support of a UC environment, and alternative technologies that provide similar functionality. Challenges and opportunities associated with a UC environment will be addressed, as well as how this environment can respond to individual learning styles when teaching to a diverse student population. As part of this decision of implementing a UC system, one must consider whether it is worth the resources to implement this technology or whether disparate systems with the same functionality will suffice. This paper will address that question by describing the strategy CSI is following in order to move towards the successful adoption of a UC environment in both administrative and pedagogical applications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bower, M. (2011). Synchronous collaboration competencies in web-conferencing environments – their impact on the learning process. Distance Education, 32(1), 63-83.

cisco.com, (2014). Cisco unified application environment application developer getting started guide. Retrieved July 29, 2014, from http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuae/2_5/english/developer/gettin g_started/guide/CUAE_Getting-Started_Book-Wrapper/start.html

Colbert, R. (2005). New technologies for the education market smash barriers in distance

learning. Distance Learning, 2(4), 7-8. College of Staten Island. (2014). About CSI. Retrieved from the CSI Web site: http://www.csi.cuny.edu/aboutcsi/

CUNY, (2013). Council of president’s presentation, Lehman College

Cuthbert, P. (2005). The student learning process: Learning styles or learning approaches? Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 235-249.

Dietz, G. (2010). Unified learning and collaboration meeting the needs of education and training in the twenty-first century. Distance Learning, 7(3), 45-49.

Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. (2000). Practical approaches to using learning styles in higher education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

Findthebest.com, (2014). CUNY College of Staten Island. Retrieved August 2, 2014, from http://colleges.findthebest.com/l/2757/CUNY-College-of-Staten-Island

Gardner, H. (2004). Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

Greenfield, D. (2006). Unified communications: Handle with care. Network Computing, 17(18), 32-41.

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.

Herrell, E. (2011). IT organizations expand unified communications functionality as solutions mature. Computer Economics Report, 4-12.

Langer, J. (2008). Instant messaging and text messaging: An overview. Retrieved August 6, 2014, from http://www.jennalanger.com/academic/LangerJenna-IM_SMS.pdf

McLaughlan, R. G., & Kirkpatrick, D. (2004). Online role play: Design for active learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 477-490.

Microsoft Corporation, (2014). Lync. Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://products.office.com/en-us/lync/lync-2013-video-conferencing-meeting-software

New Media Consortium, NMC. (2005). A global imperative: The report of the 21st century literacy summit (Issue Brief No. 0-9765087-1-0). Stanford, CA

Nicholas, A. (2008). Preferred learning methods of the millennial generation. Salve Regina University, Retrieved July 30, 2014, from http://digitalcommons.salve.edu/

Park, Y., & Bonk, C. (2007). Is online life a breeze? A case study of promoting synchronous learning in a blended graduate course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 307-323.

Rash, W. (2010). Unified communications: Taking a piecemeal approach. eWeek, 18-20.

Reynor, R. (2007). Hybrid learning: Maximizing student engagement. Campus Technology, Retrieved October 12, 2014, from http://campustechnology.com/articles/2007/05/hybrid- learning-maximizing-student-engagement.aspx

Sadler-Smith, E., & Smith, P. J. (2004). Strategies for accommodating individuals’ styles and preferences in flexible learning programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 395-412.

Saravia-Shore, M. (2008). Diverse teaching strategies for diverse learners. In W. Cole (Eds.), Educating everybody’s children: Diverse teaching strategies for diverse learners. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/107003/chapters/Educating-Everybody's- Children@-We-Know-What-We-Need-to-Do.aspx

Schaffhauser, D. (2008). VoIP is worth it? T.H.E. Journal, 35(11), 26-31.

Shamoon, E. (2009). Texting is preferred communication method for college students. Retrieved August 3, 2014, from http://www.switched.com/2009/03/29/texting-is-preferred- communication-method-for-college-students/

Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 295-299.

Smith, J. (2002). Learning styles: Fashion fad or lever for change? The application of learning style theory to inclusive curriculum delivery. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 63-70.

Thompson, P. (2013). How digital native learners describe themselves. Educational and information Technologies, Springer, 1-18.

U.S. Department of Education, (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Retrieved August 3, 2014, from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/netp.pdf

U.S. News & World Report. (2012). America’s best bang for the buck colleges. Retrieved July 29, 2014, from Washington Monthly Web site: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/septemberoctober_2012/features/americas _bestbangforthebuck_co039461.php

Valdez, G., McNabb, M., Foertsch, M., Anderson, M., Hawkes, M., & Raack, L. (2004). Computer based technology and learning: Evolving uses and expectations. Retrieved March 8, 2007, from North Central Regional Educational Laboratory Web site: http://www.ncrel.org/tplan/cbtl/toc.htm

Vanchieri, T., Sebby, L., & Dooley, G. (2013). Toward a ubiquitous virtual collaboration environment: A fusion of traditional and leading-edge virtualization tools that empower distributed participants to explore, discover and exchange information without traditional boundaries or constraints. Information Services & Use, 33, 235-241.

Villano, M. (2007). United Communications. Campus Technology. Retrieved August 18, 2014, from http://campustechnology.com/Articles/2007/07/United- Communications.aspx?Page=1

Wang, C., Jaeger, D., Liu, J., Guo, X., & Xie, N. (2013). Linking research & practice to improve learning. Learning, 57(1), 20-25.

Wikipedia.org, (2014). Unified communications. Retrieved July 21, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_communications

Downloads

Published

2014-09-30

How to Cite

Kahn, P. (2014). Unified Communications Technology: The Considerations for Adoption for Administration and Pedagogy. HETS Online Journal, 5(1), 114-142. https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v5.n1.206

Issue

Section

Articles