Randomized Control Pilot of Virtual Reality, Empathy, Knowledge, Emotions, and Self-Efficacy among Undergraduate Health Science Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v13.n1.61Keywords:
virtual reality, undergraduate, randomized control, empathyAbstract
Immersive, embodied virtual reality (VR) combines a head-mounted display with head and motion tracking systems, noise-cancelling headphones for sound, and a three-dimensional interaction scenario. VR can enable social work students to become fully immersed in a simulated realistic world to experience client scenarios. Scant research has been conducted on VR and undergraduate students; this study aimed to answer the research questions: 1) What is the feasibility and acceptability of virtual reality in a large, undergraduate class? and 2) Is virtual learning more effective than an active learning assignment on undergraduate students’ knowledge, empathy, emotions, and self-efficacy? A pilot randomized control pilot study was conducted with undergraduate students (N = 18) in an introductory course. Students were randomized to receive VR (intervention group) or an active learning assignment (control group) to learn about people with Alzheimer’s Disease, vision impairment, or end-of-life. VR was feasible and acceptable among students who commonly reported it as “cool”. The results found that students in the VR group reported more empathy for health conditions and poorer self-efficacy to support clients than the control groups. The reality that immersive VR enables has profound potential for preparing future health professionals to support clients with health conditions.
Metrics
References
Araújo, P., Duarte, T., & Magro, M. (2018). Effect of simulation for meaningful learning. Ufpe Online Nursing Journal, 12(12), 3416-3425. doi: https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v12i12a237671p3416-3425-2018
Berg, H., & Steinsbekk, A. (2020). Is individual practice in an immersive and interactive virtual reality application non-inferior to practicing with traditional equipment in learning systematic clinical observation? A randomized controlled trial. BMC medical education, 20, 1-10.
Bostrom, N. (2003). Are we living in a computer simulation? The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211), 243-255.
Buchman, S., & Henderson, D. (2019). Interprofessional empathy and communication competency development in healthcare professions’ curriculum through immersive virtual reality experiences. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 15, 127-130.
Concannon, B. J., Esmail, S., & Roduta Roberts, M. (2019, August). Head-mounted display virtual reality in post-secondary education and skill training. Frontiers in Education, 4(80).
Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards. Received from: https://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-EPAS
Dyer, E., Swartzlander, B. J., & Gugliucci, M. R. (2018). Using virtual reality in medical education to teach empathy. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 498.
Elzie, C.A. & Shaia, J. A. (2021). Pilot Study of the impact of virtually embodying a patient with a terminal iIllness. Medical Science Educator. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01243-9
Embodied Labs. (2021). Patient scenarios. Received from: https://embodiedlabs.com/content-library/#alfreds-experience
Foronda, C. L., Alfes, C. M., Dev, P., Kleinheksel, A. J., Nelson, D. A., O’Donnell, J. M., & Samosky, J. T. (2017). Virtual nursing: Emerging technologies in nursing education. Nursing Educator, 42(1), 14-17.
Francis, E. R., Bernard, S., Nowak, M. L., Daniel, S., & Bernard, J. A. (2020). Operating room virtual reality immersion improves self-efficacy amongst preclinical physician assistant students. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(4), 947-952.
Hannans, J. & Nevins, C. (in press). See it, hear it, feel it: Embodying a patient experience through immersive virtual reality. Information and Learning Sciences.
Huttar, C. M., & BrintzenhofeSzoc, K. (2020). Virtual reality and computer simulation in social work education: A systematic review. Journal of Social Work Education, 56(1), 131-141.
Issleib, M., Kromer, A., Pinnschmidt, H. O., Süss-Havemann, C., & Kubitz, J. C. (2021). Virtual reality as a teaching method for resuscitation training in undergraduate first year medical students: a randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 29(1), 1-9.
Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85-119.
Lane, D. (2017). The greatest virtual reality headset in the universe. Received from: http://www.integralworld.net/lane132.html
Lee, E. K. O. (2014). Use of avatars and a virtual community to increase cultural competence. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(1-2), 93-107.
Levine, J., & Adams, R. H. (2013). Introducing case management to students in a virtual world: An exploratory study. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4-5), 552-565.
Li, L., Yu, F., Shi, D., Shi, J., Tian, Z., Yang, J., Wang, X., & Jiang, Q. (2017). Application of virtual reality technology in clinical medicine. American Journal of Translational Research, 9(9), 3867.
Liaw, S. Y., Ooi, S. W., Rusli, K. D. B., Lau, T. C., San Tam, W. W., & Chua, W. L. (2020). Nurse-physician communication team training in virtual reality versus live simulations: randomized controlled trial on team communication and teamwork attitudes. Journal of mMedical Internet research, 22(4), e17279.
Reinsmith-Jones, K., Kibbe, S., Crayton, T., & Campbell, E. (2015). Use of second life in social work education: Virtual world experiences and their effect on students. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(1), 90-108.
Riva, G., Wiederhold, B. K., & Mantovani, F. (2019). Neuroscience of virtual reality: from virtual exposure to embodied medicine. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(1), 82-96.
Rizzo, A. & Shilling, R. (2017). Clinical Virtual Reality tools to advance the prevention, assessment, and treatment of PTSD. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8(sup5), doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1414560
Seipel, M. M. O., Johnson, J. D., & Walton, E. (2011). Desired characteristics for MSW students and social work employees: cognitive versus personal attributes. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), doi: https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900124
Shin, H., Rim, D., Kim, H., Park, S., & Shon, S. (2019, December). Educational characteristics of virtual simulation in nursing: An integrative review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 37(C), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.08.002
Tandy, C., Vernon, R., & Lynch, D. (2017). Teaching note—Teaching student interviewing competencies through second life. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(1), 66-71.
Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Knopf.
Wan, W. H., & Lam, A. H. Y. (2019). The effectiveness of virtual reality-based simulation in health professions education relating to mental illness: A literature review. Health, 11(6), 646-660.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kristen Linton, Jaime A. Hannans, Colleen M. Nevins, Richard J. Linton
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy Statement
HETS Online Journal has adopted an open access policy and provides immediate access to its content free of charge to the reader. The journal does not pass on the cost of publication or submission of manuscripts, known as an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors.
HOJ is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA.
