Tendencias en la Evaluación de Cursos en Línea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v9.n2.290Keywords:
curriculum evaluation, Kirkpatrick Model, CIPP ModelAbstract
The purpose of the paper is to identify trends in the evaluation of online courses. For this purpose, a literature review was conducted and then the studies were classified by the purpose of the evaluation. In addition, the evaluation models and approaches used were identified. It is concluded that in the evaluation of online courses, there is a clear tendency to evaluate the effectiveness and quality of online courses, as well as the use of questionnaires. The evaluation of an online course should be systematic, not limited to the study of student achievement and satisfaction.
Metrics
References
Allen, B. y Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Recuperado de http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf
Allen, B. y Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Recuperado de http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradelevel.pdf
Allen, B. y Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Recuperado de http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
Chapman, D. D. (2006). Building an evaluation plan for fully online degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(1), 19 pp. Recuperado de http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring91/chapman91.htm
Feinstein, A. H. (2004). A model for evaluating online instruction. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 31, 32-39. Recuperado de https://absel-ojs- ttu.tdl.org/absel/index.php/absel/article/view/636/605
Fetaji, B. y Fetaji, M. (2009). E-learning indicators: A multi-dimensional model for planning and evaluating e-learning software solutions. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 7 (1), 1-28.
Galloway, D. L. (2005). Evaluating distance delivery and e-learning: Is Kirkpatrick's model relevant?. Performance Improvement, 44 (4), 21-27.
Gazi, Z. A. (2011). A Step for evaluating constructivist approach integrated online courses. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (3), 13-20.
Ginns, P. y Ellis, R. A. (2009). Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (4), 652-663. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00861.x
Hallett, K. y Essex, C. (2002). Evaluating online instruction: Adapting a training model to e- learning in higher education. Recuperado de la base de datos ERIC. (ED477023)
Hassan, H., Hassan, F., Omar, N., Zakaria, Z. y Nor, W. M. (2012). Evaluating mathematics e- learning materials: Do evaluators agree with distance learners?. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67 (1), 189-195.
Mashhour, A. y Saleh, Z. (2010). Evaluating e-learning in Jordanian institutions: Why is it lagging?. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11 (4), 269-279.
Medina Díaz, M. del R. y Verdejo Carrión, A. L. (2006). ¿Evaluación o avalúo?. INEVA en Acción, 2(4), 1-5. Recuperado de http://ineva.uprrp.edu
Ozkan, S. y Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation.
Computers & Education, 53 (4), 1285-1296. doi:10.1016/j.compedu. 2009. 06.011
Rodríguez, J. y Miguel, V. (2005). Uso del modelo CIPP para evaluar la implementación y los resultados de un programa de capacitación en línea. Revista Comportamiento, 7(1), 71- 92.
Rodríguez Hernández, M. A., Flores Guerrero, K. y López de la Madrid, M. C. (2010). Modelo multidimensional para la evaluación de cursos en línea desde la perspectiva del estudiante. Apertura: Revista de Innovación Educativa, 2 (2), 60-73.
Sandia, B., Montilva, J. y Barrios, J. (2005). Cómo evaluar cursos en línea. Educere, 9 (31), 523- 530.
Santoveña Casal, S. (2010). Cuestionario de evaluación de la calidad de los cursos virtuales de la UNED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 25, 1-22. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=54717071003
Schulte, M. (2009). Efficient evaluation of online course facilitation: The "Quick Check" policy measure. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 57 (2), 110-116.
Tsai, M. (2009). The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating student e- learning from metacognitive perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (1), 34- 48.
Tello Díaz-Maroto, I. (2010). Modelo de evaluación de la calidad de cursos formativos impartidos a través de internet. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 13 (1), 209-240. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3314/331427212010.pdf
Tokmak, H. S., Baturay, H. M. y Fadde, P. (2013). Applying the context, input, process, product evaluation model for evaluation, research, and redesign of an online master's
program. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 14 (3), 273- 292.
Urbina Nájera, A. B., Pérez Camacho, B. N. y Rodríguez Huesca, R. (2013). Aplicación del modelo ELQ en la evaluación de la calidad en la educación a distancia impartida en la UPPuebla. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 16 (1), 155-172. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=331427377008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy Statement
HETS Online Journal has adopted an open access policy and provides immediate access to its content free of charge to the reader. The journal does not pass on the cost of publication or submission of manuscripts, known as an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors.
HOJ is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA.
