Student and Faculty Perspectives on Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Cross-Sectional Study at a Community College

Authors

  • Sherese A. Mitchell Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)
  • Asrat Amnie Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)
  • Jacqueline M. DiSanto Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)
  • Allison Franzese Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)
  • Carlos Guevara
  • Juno Morrow Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)
  • Silvia Reyes Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)
  • Maria Subert Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v11.n1.26

Keywords:

Student Evaluation of Teaching, student retention, higher education

Abstract

How do we improve student retention and graduation rates in the face of ever- changing challenges across individual, institutional, and social levels? This is one of the most important questions that continues to haunt institutions of higher education. Furthermore, public colleges face a continued decrease in funding as a result of state budget cuts and seek new ways to cope with the financial stress. Current best practices make the use of technology the preferred option available for academic continuity and the only option on this campus.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Sherese A. Mitchell, Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)

Associate Professor in Education Department
Instructional Evaluation Committee at
Hostos Community College for the 2017-2020 term

Asrat Amnie, Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)

Assistant Professor in Education Department
Instructional Evaluation Committee at 
Hostos Community College for the 2017-2020 term

Jacqueline M. DiSanto, Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)

Professor, Chair of Education Department,
Coordinator of Teacher Education
Instructional Evaluation Committee at 
Hostos Community College for the 2017-2020 term

Allison Franzese, Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)

Assistant Professor in Natural Sciences Department
Instructional Evaluation Committee at 
Hostos Community College for the 2017-2020 term

Carlos Guevara

Director of Office of Educational Technology,
Co- Director of Center for Teaching and Learning
Instructional Evaluation Committee at
Hostos Community College for the 2017-2020 term

Juno Morrow, Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)

Assistant Professor of Game Design
and Game Design Program Coordinator
Instructional Evaluation Committee at 
Hostos Community College for the 2017-2020 term

Silvia Reyes, Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)

Director of Special Projects & Student Engagement
Instructional Evaluation Committee at 
Hostos Community College for the 2017-2020 term

Maria Subert, Hostos Community College of the City University of New York (CUNY)

Assistant Professor in Humanities
Instructional Evaluation Committee at 
Hostos Community College for the 2017-2020 term

References

Bain, S., Fedynich, L., & Knight, M. (2011). The successful graduate student: A review of the factors for success. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 3.

Baldwin, T., & Blattner, N. (2003). Guarding against potential bias in student evaluations: What every faculty member needs to know. College Teaching, 51(1), 27–32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207

Berk, R. A. (2014). Should student outcomes be used to evaluate teaching? Journal of Faculty Development, 28(2), 87–96.

Boysen, G. A., Kelly, T. J., Raesly, H. N., & Casner, R. W. (2014). The (mis)interpretation of teaching evaluations by college faculty and administrators. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.860950

Bresciani, M., Zelna, C., & Anderson, J. (2004). Assessing Student Learning and Development: A Handbook for Practitioners. NASPA-Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education.

Cantrell, S., & Kane, T. J. (2013). Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from the MET project’s three-year study. MET Project Research Paper.

Cavanaugh, J. K., & Jacquemin, S. J. (2015). A large sample comparison of grade-based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-to-face courses. Online Learning,

(2), n2.

Donovan, J., Mader, C., & Shinsky, J. (2007). Online vs. traditional course evaluation formats: Student perceptions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3),

-180.

Felton, J., Koper, P. T., Michell, J., & Stinson, M. (2008). Attractiveness, easiness, and other issues: Student evaluations of professors on RateMyProfessors.com. Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601122803

Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. (2005). Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24, 369– 376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013

Keeling, R. P., Wall, A. F., Underhile, R., & Dungy, G. J. (2008). Assessment reconsidered: Institutional effectiveness for student success. Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education.

Kozub, R. M. (2008). Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns and possible solutions. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 5(11).

Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2017). Qualitative communication research methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Macfadyen, L. P., Dawson, S., Prest, S., & Gaševi?, D. (2015). Whose feedback? A multilevel analysis of student completion of end-of-term teaching evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1044421

Merritt, D. (2008). Bias, the brain, and student evaluations of teaching. St John’s Law Review, 82(1), 235–287. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.963196

Nasser-Abu Alhija, F. (2017). Teaching in higher education: Good teaching through students’ lens. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.006

Rubin, D. L., & Smith, K. A. (1990). Effects of accent, ethnicity, and lecture topic on undergraduates’ perceptions of non-native English-speaking teaching assistants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(90)90019-S

Uttl B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007

Weinberg, B. A., Fleisher, B. M., & Hasimoto, M. (2007). Evaluating methods for evaluating instruction: The case of higher education (NBER Working Paper No. 12844). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research: http://www.nber.org/papers/w12844 effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007

Downloads

Published

2020-11-15

How to Cite

Mitchell, S. A., Amnie, A., DiSanto, J. M., Franzese, A., Guevara, C., Morrow, J., Reyes, S., & Subert, M. (2020). Student and Faculty Perspectives on Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Cross-Sectional Study at a Community College. HETS Online Journal, 11(1), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v11.n1.26

Issue

Section

Articles