Re-inventing Remedial Reading in the 21st Century: A Review of the Benefits and Challenges of a Hybrid Remedial Reading Course

Authors

  • Toni Ann Hernen Bronx Community College, City University of New York

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v6.n2.231

Keywords:

remedial course, remedial reading course

Abstract

Remedial courses have been the center of attention over the past decade. More students enter college and take at least one remedial course because they have failed the entrance exams that determine if students have the basic skills to take credit bearing courses. The increase in enrollment for these courses has left administrators to find other sources and programs to accelerate the process. Students who are not accelerated through the remedial courses are sometimes left with taking more than one remedial in a semester. This setback can potentially delay the student’s matriculation and eventually cause the student to drop out of college. This paper examines a first year pilot hybrid remedial reading course offered in the Fall of 2015. Further, this small-scale study illustrates the benefits and effects of a hybrid remedial reading course and provides future recommendations for achievement. Using qualitative and quantitative data, the hybrid remedial reading course was determined to provide positive outcomes when comparing the treated and non-treated groups. It was further observed that the students found the course to be innovative and spark their interests. The promise of a new alternative to remedial reading in the 21st century has the potential to boost student attainment, matriculation, and progress.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 152-155.

Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. routledge.

Burgess, M. L. (2009). Using WebCT as a Supplemental Tool to Enhance Critical Thinking and Engagement among Developmental Reading Students. Journal of College Reading And Learning, 39(2), 9-33.

Conley, D. T. (2010). Replacing Remediation with Readiness. An NCPR Working Paper. National Center for Postsecondary Research.

Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education, 27(2), 197-215.

Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(10). Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm

Hodara, M., Jaggars, S. S., & Karp, M. M. (2012). Improving Developmental Education Assessment and Placement: Lessons from Community Colleges across the Country. CCRC Working Paper No. 51. Community College Research Center, Columbia University.

Jackson, M. J., & Helms, M. M. (2008). Student Perceptions of Hybrid Courses: Measuring and Interpreting Quality. Journal of Education for Business, 84(1), 7-12.

Johnson, M. (2008). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. University of Chicago Press.

Littleton Jr, R. (2000). The Impact of Developmental Education: Myths and Misconceptions.

Husmann, D. E., & Miller, M. T. (2001). Improving distance education: Perceptions of program administrators. Online journal of distance learning administration, 4(1).

Noble, D. F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. Science as culture, 7(3), 355-368.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2004). Critical Thinking... and the Art of Close Reading, Part III. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(1), 36-37.

Oxford, R. L. (1994). Language learning strategies: An update. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, Center for Applied Linguistics.

Shih, W., & Allen, M. (2007). Working with Generation-D: adopting and adapting to cultural learning and change. Library Management, 28(1/2), 89-100.

Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic books.

Yang, Y. F. (2012). Blended learning for college students with English reading difficulties. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 393-410.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-28

How to Cite

Hernen, T. A. (2016). Re-inventing Remedial Reading in the 21st Century: A Review of the Benefits and Challenges of a Hybrid Remedial Reading Course. HETS Online Journal, 6(2), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v6.n2.231

Issue

Section

Articles