Relación entre las destrezas de información con la ansiedad bibliotecaria experimentada por estudiantes subgraduados en la modalidad a distancia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v13.n2.121Keywords:
library anxiety, information literacy, distance educationAbstract
The purpose of this research was to examine the perception of distance undergraduate students about their information literacy skills, and the relationship with the level of library anxiety they might experience. The research was quantitative, with a non-experimental design and a correlational scope. An electronic questionnaire was administered using two instruments: the Perception of Information Literacy Scale by Doyle et al. (2019), and the Library Anxiety Scale in Virtual Environments, based on the Library Anxiety Scale by Bostick (1992). Fifty undergraduate students aged 21 or over, from a distance baccalaureate program, and studying their second year onwards, participated in the study. The results suggest that the participants have a high perception of their information literacy skills, and that they experience a mild level of library anxiety. This negative correlation allows inferring the importance of developing information literacy skills in distance undergraduate students to reduce their levels of library anxiety, which are adverse to student academic performance (Onwuegbuzie & Jiao, 2004).
Metrics
References
Referencias
Ali Hassan, F., Abd Aziz, N., & Siew Lee, O. (2016). Profiling information-seeking behavior of distance learning students in Wawasan Open University. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2016-0026
Anwar, M. A., Al-Kandari, N. M., & Al-Qallaf, C. L. (2004). Use of Bostick's Library Anxiety Scale on undergraduate biological sciences students of Kuwait University. Library & information science research, 26(2), 266-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2004.01.007
Association of College and Research Libraries. American Library Association. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework/
Bloom, B., & Deyrup, M. (2012, Nov.). The truth is out: How students really search [Acta de conferencia]. Charleston Library Conference, Charleston, SC. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315103
Bostick, S. L. (1992). The development and validation of the library anxiety scale (Publication No. 9310624) [Tesis doctoral, Wayne State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Budiman, R. (2016). Factors related to students’ drop out from a distance language learning program. [Paper presentation]. E-Learning and Distance Education Conference, Lahore, Pakistan. http://repository.ut.ac.id/2737/1/eldec_rahmat_budiman.pdf
Centeno Alayón, P. (2014). Módulos instruccionales en línea: una alternativa para el desarrollo de destrezas de información. En J. Meléndez, Y. Montalvo, C. Roma & E. Calcaño (Eds.), Informe: Educación virtual y a distancia en Puerto Rico (pp. 145-152). Departamento de Estado del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico. https://virtualeduca.org/documentos/observatorio/2014/informe-educacion-virtual-y-a-distancia-en-puerto-rico.pdf
D'Couto, M., & Rosenhan, S. H. (2015). How students research: Implications for the library and faculty. Journal of Library Administration, 55(7), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1076312
Doyle, M., Foster, B, & Yukhymenko-Lescroart, M. A. (2019). Initial development of the Perception of Information Literacy Scale (PILS). Communications in Information Literacy, 13(2), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.2.5
Flood, P. (2015). Critical thinking skills and information literacy skills: Discerning online information among high school students [Tesis doctoral, Liberty University]. Scholars Crossing: The Institutional Repository of Liberty University. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1071/
Grandy, R. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness of a credit-bearing information literacy course in reducing library anxiety for adult learners. Communications in Information Literacy, 13(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.3
Grassian, E.S., & Kaplowitz, J.R. (2009). Information literacy instruction: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.
Harmer, A. (2017). Exploring the Googlesphere: Information literacy and first-year college students (Tesis de maestría, Kennesaw State University). Digital Commons @ Kennesaw State University. http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/msfys_etd/2
Hernández Sampieri, R., & Mendoza Torres, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education.
Holmes Ramírez, N. (2015). Ansiedad bibliotecaria en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 38(3), 227-236. http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/RIB/article/view/24133
Jiao, Q. G., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1995). Library anxiety: Characteristics of ‘at-risk’college students. [Paper presentation]. Annual Mid-South Educational Research Association Conference, Biloxi, MS. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED416896.pdf
Johnson, C. (2017). Academic library behaviors and perceptions of a community college’s distance learners (Publication No. 10265929) [Tesis doctoral, University of South Carolina]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Jones, W. L., & Mastrorilli, T. (2022). Assessing the impact of an information literacy course on students' academic achievement: A mixed-methods study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(2), 61-87. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30090
Koltay, T., Spiranec, S., & Karvalics, L. Z. (2016). Research 2.0 and the future of information literacy. Elsevier Ltd.
Lackey, N., & Wingate, A. (1998). The pilot study: One key to research success. In P. J. Brink, & M. J. Wood (Eds.). Advanced design in nursing research (pp. 375-386). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204840.n15
Latham, D., & Gross, M. (2007, March). What they don’t know can hurt them: Competency theory, library anxiety, and student self-assessments of their information literacy skills. [Paper presentation]. Thirteenth ACRL National Conference, Maryland, US. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/baltimore/papers/277.pdf
Marvel, R. (2015). A survey of students' perception of individual information literacy skills and application of information skills at Casper Community College (Publication No. 3712663). [Tesis doctoral, University of Wyoming]. ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis.
McCarthy, S. C. (2017). Exploring library usage by online learners with student success. The Community College Enterprise, 23(2), 27-31.
McPherson, M. A. (2015). Library anxiety among university students: A survey. IFLA Journal, 41(4), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215603993
Mellon, C. A. (1986). Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its development. College & Research Libraries, 47(2), 160-165. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/viewFile/14195/15641
Mery, Y., Newby, J., & Peng, K. (2012). Why one-shot information literacy sessions are not the future of instruction: A case for online credit courses. College & Research Libraries, 73(4), 366-377. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-271
Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (1): Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing, En C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning – Ten Years On. OCSLD
Moore, M. G. (2013). The theory of transactional distance. En M. G. Moore, Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 66-85). Routledge.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2004). Information search performance and research achievement: An empirical test of the Anxiety?Expectation Mediation model of library anxiety. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10342
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Jiao, Q.G., & Bostick, S.L. (2004). Library anxiety: Theory, research, and applications. En R.R. Powell & L. Westbrook (Series Ed.), Research Methods in Library and Information Studies. Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S. & Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (6ta ed.). Information Age Publishing.
Tang, Y., & Tseng, H. W. (2013). Distance learners' self-efficacy and information literacy skills. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 517-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.008
Taylor, A. (2012). A study of the information search behavior of the millennial generation. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 17(1), 1-20. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ971949
Theiss, D. (2022). Distance and online learners and library anxiety: An exploration into the causes, impact, and recommendations for practice. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2022.2112799
Tury, S., Robinson, L. & Bawden, D. (2015). The information seeking behavior of distance learners: A case study of the University of London international programs. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.00
Usman, K. (2019). Information needs and seeking behavior of distance learning university students. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 9(2), 139-148. http://tojned.net/journals/tojned/volumes/tojned-volume09-i02.pdf#page=69
Van Kampen-Breit, D. J., & Cooke, R. (2015). Do they think we’re the frenemy? Examining student anxiety and service perception in today’s academic libraries. Library Leadership & Management, 30(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v30i1.7117
Zhao, S. (2019). A study of graduate students’ information literacy needs in the electronic resource environment (Publication No. 13878932) [Tesis doctoral, University of Windsor]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Giselle M. Garriga Vidal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy Statement
HETS Online Journal has adopted an open access policy and provides immediate access to its content free of charge to the reader. The journal does not pass on the cost of publication or submission of manuscripts, known as an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors.
HOJ is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA.