Running Head: Using Computers to Teach Science Can Computer Technology Improve the Quality of Science Education at Urban Universities?

Authors

  • Maryam Bamshad Department of Biological Sciences, Lehman College – The City University of New York, Bronx, NY 10468, USA
  • Gina Rae Foster The Title V Office of Supplemental Instruction & Technology, Lehman College – The City University of New York, Bronx, NY 10468, USA
  • Paul G. Kreuzer The Title V Office of Supplemental Instruction & Technology, Lehman College – The City University of New York, Bronx, NY 10468, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v1.n1.78

Keywords:

constructivist model, science education

Abstract

Research has shown that technology can be a powerful educational tool in facilitating a constructivist approach to teaching science. Research also shows that academic support for students and faculty development activities are positively linked to supporting science teaching and learning. However, despite the availability of these resources at many urban universities, instructors rarely engage students in collaborative learning. This article uses a case study to describe both the challenges and results of implementing a constructivist model of instruction at a mid-size urban college. The article demonstrates the successful implementation of an online interactive course management system and Supplemental Instruction in large classrooms, with the caveat that such practices require extensive training for instructors, staff and students to be feasible. At Lehman College of the City University of New York, both Title V grant and college administrative support has enabled the creation of a model of collaborative engagement that has successfully fostered partnership among instructors, students and staff in constructivist learning and active use of computer technology at an urban college.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arendale, D. R. (1993). Foundation and theoretical framework for Supplemental Instruction. In D. C. Martin, & D. R. Arendale (Eds.), Supplemental Instruction: Improving first-year student success in high-risk courses (2nd ed., pp. 19-26). Monograph Series No. 7.

Columbia, SC: National Resource Center for The First Year Experience and Students in Transition. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED354839).

Gaffikin, F., & Morrissey, M. (2008). A new synergy for universities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3 (1), 97-116.

Hooper, S. & Rieber, L. P. (1995). Teaching with technology. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Teaching: Theory into Practice. (pp. 154-170) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Jacobson, T. C., Smith, G. D. & Wright, R. E. (2007). Knowledge for Generations: Wiley and the Global Publishing Industary, 1807-2007. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kogan, M. (1984). Problems of the urban university: Great Britain and U.S.A. In H. Wasser (Ed.), The Functions and Problems of the Urban University: A Comparative Perspective (pp. 46-53). New York: City University of New York.

Rendon, L. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19 (1), 33-51.

Riposa, G. (2003). Urban universities: meeting the needs of students. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585 (1), 51-65.

Stellin, S. (2001, May 7). Textbook publishers try online education. New York Times Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com

Downloads

Published

2022-11-06

How to Cite

Bamshad, M., Foster, G. R., & Kreuzer, P. G. (2022). Running Head: Using Computers to Teach Science Can Computer Technology Improve the Quality of Science Education at Urban Universities?. HETS Online Journal, 1(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v1.n1.78

Issue

Section

Articles