An Open Educational Resource for Teaching Revision: Flesch-Kincaid Readability Statistics

Authors

  • Beth Counihan Department of English, Queensborough Community College-CUNY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v11.n2.40

Keywords:

open educational resource, OER, Readability test

Abstract

This article presents the findings of a one-semester-long qualitative study conducted pre-pandemic at a diverse urban public community college with ENGL101: Freshman Composition students and suggests the need for further study. Students were assigned to revise New York Times article summaries they had written, using revision techniques learned in the classroom and an open educational resource (OER), Flesch- Kincaid Readability Statistics. Data collection included collecting summaries before and after revising with Readability Statistics and student reflections on the experience. Most students saw the grade level of their writing increase by two levels after revising with Flesch-Kincaid Readability Statistics. Moreover, students’ understanding of revision increased, particularly in the skills of word choice, sentence complexity and elaboration. In addition, the limitations of the Flesch-Kincaid Readability Statistics program helped students gain insight into stylistic concerns. Overall, eighty-five percent of the participating students found using Readability Statistics to be useful and a motivator. While more rigorous research needs to be done, the findings of this study can be applied to any college writing classroom in any modality and have beneficial implications for the uncertainty of this near-post-pandemic historical moment, as the Flesch- Kincaid Readability Statistics program is an OER, freely available to all students and faculty.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Beth Counihan, Department of English, Queensborough Community College-CUNY

Associate Professor, Department of English,
Queensborough Community College-CUNY

References

Carillo, E. (2015). Securing a place for reading in composition. CO: University Press of Colorado.

Dyke Ford, J. (2018). “Abstract Analysis and Revision Assignment Using MS Word Readability Statistics” Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments 2, 1. https://thepromptjournal.com/index.php/prompt/article/view/20/39

Flesch, R. (1951) How to write better. New York: Science Research Associates.

Flesch, R. (1955) Why johnny can’t read. New York: Harper and Brothers.

Hillocks, G. (1986) Research in Written Composition: New directions for teaching. ERIC Clearinghouse for Reading and Communication Skills and the National Council of Teachers of English. Urbana, IL.

Horning, A., Gollnitz, D., & Haller, C.R., eds. (2017) What is College Reading? The WAC Clearinghouse and University Press of Colorado http://wac.colostate.edu/books/atd/collegereading.

Howard R.M,, Serviss, T., Rodriguez T.K. (2010) Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing and Pedagogy 2 (2), 177-192.

Murray, D.M. (1972). Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet. https://writemurraynina.blogspot.com/2012/04/0-false-18-pt-18-pt-0-0-false- false.html

Queensborough Community College-Office of Institutional Research. QCC fact book, (2020) https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/oira/docs/Factbook-2020.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-08-19

How to Cite

Counihan, B. (2022). An Open Educational Resource for Teaching Revision: Flesch-Kincaid Readability Statistics. HETS Online Journal, 11(2), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v11.n2.40

Issue

Section

Articles