Sistema de gestión de aprendizaje para la enseñanza del español como lengua extranjera
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v11.n2.35Keywords:
Learning management system, Spanish as a foreign language, online education, Blackboard, CanvasAbstract
Identifying how to choose or implement a learning management system for a Spanish-as-a- foreign language program in a higher education institution is very important. To do this, it will be essential to identify the market demand that the program is designed to meet. Demographics and student characteristics are essential parts of determining or making any changes to a platform. Detecting the process used to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching and as a consequence perform certain transformations and recommendations can be essential to promote the increase of registrations in a Spanish program. Although there are different and different platforms or learning technologies, two learning management systems will be compared; Blackboard platform and Canvas platform. Choosing one of them will allow to make timely changes and improve the teaching curriculum thus providing the best resources to students achieving both student success and institutional success.
Metrics
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Recuperado de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED602449
Barinelli, E., King, B., & Wivagg, D. (2015). Replacing Blackboard: Finding a new learning management system for WPI. Worcester Polytechnic Institute: Great Problems Seminar Posters. Recuperado de https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/gps- posters/424
Cardoso Espinosa, E. O., & Cerecedo Mercado, M. T. (2011). Propuesta de indicadores para evaluar la calidad de un programa de posgrado en Educación. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 13(2), 68-82. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607- 40412011000200005
Falcone, K. (2018). A Case Study of Faculty Experience and Preference of Using Blackboard and Canvas LMS (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix). Recuperado de https://search.proquest.com/openview/9ea25d654f9f9017c1678bc8dc86698d/1?pq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
García Treviño, M. D. R. (2018). El uso de estrategias de adaptación y su efecto sobre la perseverancia de estudiantes adultos en un programa de bachillerato a distancia (Tesis doctoral, Faculté des sciences de l'éducation, Montreal, Canada ). Recuperada de https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/20065
Goodman, J., Melkers, J., & Pallais, A. (2019). Can online delivery increase access to education? Journal of Labor Economics, 37(1), 1-34. Recuperado de https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/joshuagoodman/files/jole_version_without_page_n umbers.pdf
Gore F, Bloem PJN, Patton G.C, Ferguson J, & Joseph V., (2014). Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: a systematic analysis. New York: Routledge.
Karplus, S. S. (2017). Integrating academic library resources and learning management systems: The library Blackboard site. Education Libraries, 29(1), 5-11. Recuperado de https://educationlibraries.mcgill.ca/article/view/219
Kimotho, M. M. (2018). A Review of the Coping Strategies used by Male and Female Open and Distance Learning Students. African Research Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 5 (3), 2312-0134. Recuperado de http://arjess.org/education-research/a-review-of-the-coping-strategies-used-by-male-and-female-open-and- distance-learning-students.pdf
López, M. J. (2017). Necesidades formativas. Modelos para su análisis y evaluación. Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación, (6), 6-10.
Markova, T., Glazkova, I., & Zaborova, E. (2017). Quality issues of online distance learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 685-691. Recuperado de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042817300435
Meyer, J. D., & Barefield, A. C. (2010). Infrastructure and administrative support for online programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(3).
Nettles, B., & Futch, L. (2012).Instructure Canvas, UCF’snext LMS! Faculty Focus, 11(3), 2-3. Recuperado de http://fctl.ucf.edu/Publications/FacultyFocus/content/2012/2012_october.pdf
Nettles, B., & Futch, L. (November, 2012) Faculty Focus. Instructure Canvas, UCF’s Next LMS! 11(3). Recuperado de https://fctl.ucf.edu/wp- content/uploads/sites/5/2018/10/FF_2012_October.pdf
Osorio, V., & Rodríguez, M. D. P. (2018). Modelo para la evaluación de programas de ética organizacional en universidades. Información tecnológica, 29(1), 59-70. Recuperado de https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/infotec/v29n1/0718-0764-infotec-29-01- 00059.pdf
Otilia, S. M. (2015). Needs analysis in English for specific purposes. Annals of the Constantin Brâncu?i, University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, 1(2), 54-55. Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bba6/369c7b90f7fc1872941f63592a430618acbc.pdf
Paynter, K., & Barnes, J. (2019, November). Moving from Blackboard to Canvas: What the Research Says, Plus Two Professors’ Experiences. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1314-1320). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Recuperado de https://www.academia.edu/40941641/Moving_from_Blackboard_to_Canvas_What_ the_Research_Says_Plus_Two_Professors_Experiences
Pérez Cervantes, M. L., & Saker Barros, A. F. (2013). Efectividad del uso de la plataforma virtual en el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje en la Universidad del
Magdalena. Revista de Tecnología, 12(3), 68-78. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6041539
Pew Research Center (2018, February). Social Media Fact Sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/
Ponce, J., & Carrasco, F. (2016). Acceso y equidad a la educación superior y posgrado en el Ecuador, un enfoque descriptivo. Mundos Plurales-Revista Latinoamericana de Políticas y Acción Pública, 3(2), 9-22. Recuperado de https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/mundosplurales/article/view/2841
Redfern, P. (2016, May). A great college brand that works. Inside Higher Ed. Recuperado de https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/call-action-marketing-and- communications-higher-education/great-college-brand-works
Robotham D, & Julian C (2016). Stress and the higher education student: a critical review of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 107–117. Recuperado de https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03098770600617513
Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141-147.
Sönmez, H. (2019). An Examination of Needs Analysis Research in the Language Education Process. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(1), 8- 17. Recuperado de http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/5109/3804
Tucker, J., & Au, A. (2019). Reframing the marketing strategy for online education. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 11(3), 176-186. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kalani_Samarasinghe/publication/338357306_Challenges_in_Implementing_Reverse_Logistics_Practices_in_Sri_Lanka/links/5e0 f09cfa6fdcc283752ae4c/Challenges-in-Implementing-Reverse-Logistics-Practices- in-Sri-Lanka.pdf#page=181
Vu, P., Meyer, R., & Cepero, J. (2016). Models of administration for online learning programs in the US higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Educational and Policy Research, 2(1).
Wilcox, D., Thall, J., & Griffin, O. (2016). One Canvas, two audiences: How faculty and students use a newly adopted learning management system. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.). Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (pp. 1163-1168). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Zhang, Y. (2015). Rediscovering the antecedents and consequences of overshooting. Recuperado de https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2617530
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Brenda Lee Morales-González, Silvia María Ruiz-Santiago
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy Statement
HETS Online Journal has adopted an open access policy and provides immediate access to its content free of charge to the reader. The journal does not pass on the cost of publication or submission of manuscripts, known as an Article Processing Charge (APC), to authors.
HOJ is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA.
