Infusing technology to boost completion: A practical approach

Authors

  • Naydeen González-De Jesús Bergen Community College
  • Denise Liguori Bergen Community College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v4.n2.191

Keywords:

retention, higher education

Abstract

Dissatisfied with consistently low graduation rates, a community college in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States formed a cross section of student affairs professionals and created ‘Project Graduation’ to address the problem. Analysis of graduation related practices and procedures resulted in the identification of factors that contributed to the problem. Utilizing technology, student data was extracted at various completion parameters. Inefficient, manually, paper driven and labor intensive procedures, caused eligible graduates to get lost in the system and leave the college without conferred degrees.

Through a business process review and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data, an action plan was implemented to identify, communicate with, and graduate eligible students. Data mining initiatives produced immediate results, noticeably increasing the number of graduates. Via extensive use of technology, a systematic outreach process was created to support and propel students through critical milestones. Technology assisted the implementation of an Opt-out process, replacing the former Opt-in process that required student initiation, resulting in lost graduates. This process shift enables increased vital student contact, thus providing timely interventions that facilitate successful on-time degree completion. In examining factors such as characteristics of the millennial student and the current economy which requires an increase in an educated and skilled workforce, recommendations are provided for greater, more effective use of technology to streamline student affairs operations.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Hirt, J.B., Cain, D., Bryan, B., & Williams, E. (2003).Cyberservices: What’s important and how are we doing. NASPA Journal, 40(2), 98-118.

Kleinglass, N. (2005). Who is driving the changing landscape in student affairs? New Directions for Student Services, 112, 25-38.

Kretovics, M. (2002). Measuring MBA student learning: Does distance make a difference?

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2). Retrieved January 20, 2014, from www.irrodl.org.

Kuh, G.D. (2009) What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 6(50), 683-706.

Moneta, L. (2005). Technology and student affairs. New Directions for Student Services, 112, 3- 14. DOI: 10.1002/ss.180.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-30

How to Cite

González-De Jesús, N., & Liguori, D. (2014). Infusing technology to boost completion: A practical approach. HETS Online Journal, 4(2), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v4.n2.191

Issue

Section

Articles